Fixed scope, fixed duration, a written findings report and a prioritized remediation plan. Delivered by the engineers who can then execute it, which is the part most assessments leave to someone else.
Request an assessmentMost assessments end with a roadmap and a handshake. The firm that scored your environment cannot fix what it found, so the report goes to someone else, and half the context is lost in the handover. Every assessment below is scoped by the engineer who would do the remediation. You are free to take the findings elsewhere, and the report is written so that you can.
What is happening inside the estate today, measured rather than assumed. Each one produces evidence you can act on, budget against, or take to a board.
A full review of configuration, performance, backup integrity, and operational risk across the estate. Where the environment is fragile, where it is over-provisioned, and what would break first under load.
The estate measured against the control set that applies to it, whether that is the DoD Database SRG, FedRAMP, HIPAA, SOX or SOC 2. Access control, encryption posture, audit logging, and the gaps an assessor will find before they find them.
Whether the platform survives the growth already forecast. Load characteristics, contention points, index and query behaviour under projected volume, and the specific ceiling the current design hits.
Before a migration, and after one. Both are moments where an outside read is worth more than an internal estimate, because the people who built it cannot see it plainly.
Where the spend actually goes, what is running that nobody uses, and which instance and storage decisions are costing money for no return. The findings usually pay for the engagement several times over.
What it will actually take to move the estate, based on more than a hundred migrations delivered without data loss. Dependency mapping, target architecture, sequencing, and the parts that will be difficult.
Cross-cloud tradeoff analysis, platform selection, and target architecture design, grounded in hands-on delivery across all four government clouds rather than in vendor documentation. Engaged by the day or as a standing advisory arrangement.
Almost every AI initiative that stalls, stalls on the data underneath it. This is the assessment that finds out whether yours will, and what it would take to fix.
Not a maturity score against a generic model. Your data measured against what a specific AI use case actually requires, and against what an auditor, an authorizing official or a general counsel will ask before it reaches production.
For teams already building. Whether the retrieval layer is returning what it should, why grounding is failing, and where the embedding, chunking or index strategy is working against the use case.
For problems too large or too undefined to scope from the outside. A short paid engagement that produces a written statement of work, an architecture, and a fixed price, with the fee credited against delivery if you proceed.
An assessment is the cheapest way to find out whether we are the right firm and whether the problem is what you think it is. Fixed scope, fixed duration, and the findings are yours regardless of what happens next.